法友飛鴻 477：禪修、正念、治療與關於治療的法律

黎錦良： 2021/10/4

我對這個論點甚感懷疑，佛法真的不能有效的對治這樣的個案嗎？一些嗔怒真的只能必須被適當的宣洩釋放嗎？ .... "For example, someone may have learned early on that it is dangerous to get mad, as it could jeopardize a parent’s love. This may leave him in situations where he is taken advantage of because he does not have access to his legitimate anger. In therapy, we would not only discover the cause of the difficulty with anger but also encourage the practicing of it, especially at times when the client might be angry with me. By my staying steady and accepting his feeling, the client gains a living experience of being able to be angry with someone who does not retaliate or withdraw, who accepts his concerns. These types of exchanges assist the client in developing a healthy, authentic, and vital sense of self.

This aspect of psychological development was not necessary for the Buddha, and the healing of these types of wounds was not included in the Buddha’s prescription to end suffering."

-----------

蘇錦坤：　2021/10/4

我的立場很清楚。有些人的有些病不能只靠禪修治療，甚至不能依賴未得認可的醫療行為治療。

即使是在善意的佛教團體進行近於治療的活動，在許多國家的法律相關規定之下，都算是違法行為。

有些人的有些疾病可以依賴禪修或佛教規範的方法治療。

知道法律的界限，與判斷某些人的某些疾病該用何種方式治療，很複雜，我提醒的是，不要忘了法律的那一條線。(對於未具醫療證照而進行醫療行為的人，有些國家對歸化為公民的人褫奪其公民權，或取消永久居留權。)

----------

鍾聞瑜：　2021/10/4

所謂的「正念」已被應用在許多層面，我不好意思用「濫」字形容，我身邊的幾位佛友參加了幾堂課，全成了禪修老師，有人在臨終關懷指導禪修（當然，在安頓心理的恐懼和焦慮、不安一定有它的效果）還有一位應臺灣某尼師僧團指導，只是她們體認”法”和體認”正念”到什麼程度，我真的很懷疑，特別是這種事是由宗教界「出面」，他們忽略了每個人的心理層面之複雜，有時甚至扭曲，如果只是指導禪坐和冥想也就罷了，怕的是她們不知不覺的成了沒有證照的心理治療師和精神健康「顧問」，這讓我很不以為然和憂心。

而法律確實是規範這類人行為的一把尺，因為沒事就好，一旦心理狀況出現了問題，「醫療糾紛」就會現起，真的要謹慎點好。